It is understandable that Reed's first chapter is used to define and set up the context for the rest of the book. While I feel, that indeed, it seems to be a non-engaging discussion in light of the future topics, it still seems necessary to include. I find his take on technology to be somewhat refreshing. Simply because outright he clarifies that he will attempt to avoid biases where he would sound like he inherently praises technology like a god, or criticize it like a technophobe. He does makes some good points about how technology is shaping our world faster than ever. And he does delve into the fact that technology is blending into the real world. Our vocabulary is becoming more expansive, and not in the sense that we have bigger words, but we have simplified words that gets points across without extra flourish.
Information is certainly very important in today's society, and the internet is a plethora of gaining it. I do like his comparison of the internet to a wave. While a experienced web surfer may find what they need exactly and branch out from it with ease, I feel they might be limited in what they can come across. People who just ride the wave where it takes it, I feel are more prone to stumbling across random bits of information. The internet seems to hold so much more than libraries out there can. If you think about it, libraries consists of books that have went to publishers and have been proof read before it was printed. However, in the internet you can find personal blogs, where people can speak their own mind and personal experiences.
It seems that there can be no censorship in these types of writing, which is exciting (and sometimes boring or offensive). To be able to communicate with others and share their lives with each other seems to form pen-pals more efficiently and more frequently than before (where in grade school we get assigned one and we wrote letters). I do like the fact that you can see pictures too. To have imagery alongside with text creates a multi-medial space for more engagement and personal connection.
I am curious, however to what the future can hold, but part of me is afraid of the new things we can come up with. Apparently with all the new technologies coming forward, I can definitely see our lives becoming more public rather than private. I can't imagine anyone being open to constantly under scrutiny by their peers. One can isolate themselves, but it will be at a cost of not being able to connect properly with society. n other words, Reed is right about the prospect of internet, and that it holds a lot more than our previous technologies can ever have. While this sets up for illegal and disgusting things people can put up (hint: the Shadow web; absolutely disgusting), it also provides a connectivity that we have never imagined to come across. I say we're very lucky to have all these technology around us, and I'm grateful for the culture it built.
Friday, January 16, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This blog posts makes many great points and connections relating to the digital world. I agree with the statement made about how the lack of censorship on the web can be very exciting, or it can be boring and offensive. With inputs from so many people from around the world, there is an inevitable amount of nonsense that must be waded through in order to find the quality stuff. Also, the point made about how our lives might become more public rather than private is very important. Large populations of people are sharing all kinds of things on the internet, from photographs to stories, yet it is usually up to each individual how much they are willing to share. This raises the question of engagement vs. isolation from society. I partially disagree with the statement that isolating oneself from things like social media will inhibit our ability to connect properly with society. I’m not sure that social media is affecting the amount of interaction, but the quality of it. If those attached to the world in their phone would put it down, there would be more time for real, face to face social interaction which I believe benefits humanity more than screen to screen. The author of this post did a good job of explaining how limitless the web is and how great it can be for connecting people across large distances, but it is clear that there is a good and bad side to everything.
ReplyDelete